Why does the world’s tallest skyscraper look so empty?

The world’s tall buildings are filled with all kinds of junk: empty floors, empty windows, and empty offices.

These empty spaces are often used for retail or for office space, or just for decoration, according to the National Geographic Society.

And the more empty, the less likely it is that someone will actually get to enjoy it.

The height of a skyscraper is determined by the amount of space available in a building, so if a building is too small, its height will be lower.

But the taller the skyscraper, the more it will fill with junk.

It’s a problem that’s become a problem for the building industry, according the Society’s new research report.

“The more junk we see in the real world, the higher the cost of the building,” said Scott C. Warshaw, director of the Society.

He said it’s a “real problem” that affects both residential and commercial buildings.

“We think it’s probably a lot worse in commercial buildings than residential buildings.”

And that’s not just because they have less floor space to store junk.

Warchaws work is based on what he calls “the building economy theory,” which says that the height of the buildings determines the amount and quality of services people can access.

So a skyscraper that is too tall will be less useful to people, and the more floors of empty space it has, the worse it will be for people to access.

For instance, a hotel room that is 6 feet tall will only have room for about 6 people.

But a hotel that’s 6 feet wide and 2 feet tall would have room to accommodate 30 people.

Walsh said the average height of all the buildings in the world is around 7.5 feet, and he believes that the number of empty buildings in a skyscropolis can be as high as 25.

That’s because a skyscropers topography allows more space for debris to accumulate.

So when debris is added to the building, it can accumulate on the ground and then slowly fill in the floors of the skyscrapers.

That means that more debris in a tower can lead to a higher price tag for the buyer.

So Warshaws work uses “the market value of space, weight, and weight of each building” to estimate the height and weight.

He says that it has been a long time coming.

“It’s been a very long time, because we’ve been looking at this from the beginning,” he said.

“But it’s coming along well.”

He and his colleagues looked at data from the Building Industry Association of America and the US Census Bureau, and found that about 85 percent of the world has a building with a height of at least 1,500 feet.

Washiwaws team then compared the cost and availability of the most expensive and most accessible buildings in different countries around the world.

They found that countries that have more empty buildings tend to have higher prices, and that countries with more empty skyscrapes tend to be more expensive to build.

They also found that the most common reason for a building not being able to support a person is because it has a large amount of junk.

That, Warshows said, is the most important thing to look at when looking at empty buildings.

The study is published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

The National Geographic article can be found here: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/world-tall-building-why-does-the-worlds-tall_5344094.html